🔬
23
Patterns Identified
📊
18.3%
Overall Misdiagnosis Rate
⏱️
8.2 days
Avg. Diagnosis Delay
⚠️
Type I
Most Commonly Missed

🗺️ Confusion Matrix: SH Type vs. Anatomical Location

Misdiagnosis frequency heatmap
Type I
Type II
Type III
Type IV
Type V
Distal Radius
45
12
8
3
2
Distal Tibia
28
15
22
9
6
Distal Fibula
67
18
11
7
4
Prox. Humerus
14
9
5
19
8
Distal Femur
11
4
7
12
38
0-5 cases
6-15 cases
16-30 cases
31-50 cases
50+ cases
Misdiagnosis Rate by SH Type
Diagnosis Delay Distribution
SH Type:
Location:
Impact:

🔬 Top Confusion Patterns

Ranked by frequency
1
Subtle Physeal Widening Overlooked
Minimal widening of the physis (1-3mm) not recognized without comparison views, leading to missed Type I fractures
234
27.6% of cases
📍 Primarily: Distal Fibula, Distal Radius
High Impact
2
Comparison Views Not Obtained
Bilateral comparison radiographs not ordered despite clinical suspicion of physeal injury
189
22.3% of cases
📍 All Locations
High Impact
3
Type I Mistaken for Soft Tissue Injury
Normal-appearing radiograph leads to sprain/strain diagnosis when Type I fracture is present
156
18.4% of cases
📍 Ankle, Wrist
High Impact
4
Soft Tissue Swelling Undervalued
Significant soft tissue swelling present but not weighted appropriately in clinical decision making
143
16.9% of cases
📍 Ankle, Knee
Medium Impact
5
Type V Diagnosed Retrospectively
Compression injuries only identified after growth arrest or angular deformity develops months later
98
11.6% of cases
📍 Distal Femur, Proximal Tibia
High Impact
6
Normal Ossification Variants Confuse
Normal developmental variants mistaken for fractures or fractures dismissed as normal variants
87
10.3% of cases
📍 Elbow, Knee
Medium Impact
View All 23 Patterns

📋 Pattern Details

Subtle Physeal Widening Overlooked

Minimal widening of the physis (1-3mm) not recognized without comparison views, leading to missed Type I fractures.

High Impact 234 cases affected
Typical Diagnostic Journey
Present
X-ray
Missed
Return
Dx
Average delay: 9.2 days
Affected SH Types
Type I
78%
Type II
15%
Type V
7%
Contributing Factors
🔍 No comparison views obtained 89%
📊 Suboptimal image quality 34%
Busy ED environment 28%
📚 Limited pediatric experience 21%
Recommendations
💡 Always obtain bilateral comparison views in pediatric wrist and ankle injuries
💡 Consider physeal injury when point tenderness exists over growth plate
💡 Low threshold for follow-up imaging if symptoms persist beyond 5-7 days
Example Cases
View All 234 Cases